Contingency Model (IP) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Contingency Model (IP) - Essay ExampleOrganizational behavior is quite a complex phenomenon as it not only requires careful management of difficult and somewhat complicated behaviors on individual level but at the group level also. The existence of groups within organizations therefore is not a new concept and seekers, over the period of conviction, have been able to produce considerable research studies which shed light on the different organizational dynamics of the groups within organizations.The concept of In gatherings and erupt Groups is one such important concept of group dynamics which deals with the dynamics of how groups interact and exist with individually other. The gaination of such groups poop be based on tasks related or non-task related mathematical process factors.This research paper will present an analysis of the In Groups and Out Groups while at the identical time attempt to provide real life examples of both the Groups while at the same time discussing t he implications for the leadership of the organization.In Group is a group with which people attempt to identify themselves as members. in spite of appearance an organizational context, In Groups are formed by those employees who share common goal or documental and than they wish to associate themselves as members of that group. ... The basic difference between the two is the fact that they differ in level of association with each group.Example of In GroupsFor example, employees working in different departments may form different In Groups be commence they share something common like their overall performance will be reflected at the same level if it is considered on organization wide level. Another example of in group would be members belonging to certain unions i.e. may be one union of labor or employees advocating certain cause whereas another union focuses on other objectives.Example of Out GroupSimilarly, an example of Out Group would include those employees or individuals wh o do not form wish to be part of certain specialized union or group advocating certain other causes. Major difference on the two situationsAs discussed above that the basic difference between the situations is the level of association with each group. Due to association with in group, members provide tend to show in group bias by showing a well-situated strength towards members no matter if out group exist within that department. Further, In Group fundamental law give rise to the collectivism i.e. people start to share common perceptions and attitudes no matter if initially they had some disagreement. Therefore the major and basic difference between the two situations is how people show their attitude to each other within the groups.How the Two Groups Affected the Groups & the OrganizationAs discussed above that the formation of In Group and Out Group give rise to the collective thinking and attitudes therefore their formation can influence the organization as well as groups in negative as well as positive way. What is however more important is the fact that formation